OK San Diego taxpayers, if you’re like me you’ve got your tuxes pressed and shoes shined, ready to attend THE social event of the San Diego season. Set your watches for tonight at 7PM.
That , of course, is when I’ll be entertaining one and all by watching this Tuesday’s Lost on DVR ! I’ve got the widescreen and Bose sound system. You bring the popcorn. A good time will be had by all.
Unless, of course, you’re otherwise engaged. Like in attending the San Diego County Taxpayers Association’s “15TH ANNUAL GOLDEN WATCHDOG & GOLDEN FLEECE AWARDS DINNER TONIGHT: Highlighting the Good, Bad and Ugly of Local Government soiree tonight at the Town and Country.
Me? I’ve got too many bluebooks to grade and too many other things to do with the $200 or $250 ticket price (I forget the actual tab as I seem to have disposed of my invitation. ) And I really , really want to see how they resolve all those plot twists with Jack, Kate, Sawyer and the crew. (Twenty dollar bet it all ends with Jack waking up and saying, “Whoa dude, what a dream.”)
Look, I think the SDCTA is a fine group dedicated to its cause and doing no small public good in stimulating a community dialog on government accountability and oversight. They are a civic minded crew, no bones. My continual beef, petty though it is, remains that the SDCTA persists in claiming to be something it is not: a nonpartisan group that represents San Diego County taxpayers. .
I’ve already bellyached about the representing county taxpayers bit. There are plenty of county taxpayers (and, if you’ve bought a soda in the last year you, my friend, are a taxpayer) who do not see eye to eye (or adjoining universe to adjoining universe) with the SDCTA.
But I can forgive them that minor transgression. A number of brands tend to overstate themselves. Like the League of Women Voters which tend to come across of the League of Progressive Women’s Voters. And the SDCTA’s name is accurate to an extent: it is in San Diego County and does represent taxpayers. At least some of them.
My bigger beef is that the SDCTA claims to be a nonpartisan organization. It says so right in their Mission Statement, right between the claims to be a non-profit organization (true dat) and to be dedicated to promoting accountable government (true dat, too.) But then the mission statement goes on to say the SDCTA is dedicated to also promoting “cost-effective and efficient government and opposing unnecessary taxes and fees.”
And therein lies my problem.
Ain’t no way, in this partisan age of ours that you can put the words “non-partisan” and “promoting cost-effective and effective government and opposing unnecessary taxes and fees” into the same sentence without running into a massive contradiction. It is precisely determining what exactly constitutes effective and efficient government and unnecessary taxes and fees that forms the fundamental fault line between the two political major parties.
And the SDCTA consistently comes down on one side of that division.
The current June propositions are a case in point. The SDCTA website lists its June ballot recommendations (here) . So do the websites for the San Diego County Republicans (here) and the San Diego County Democrats (here). I’ve summarized their positions in the table below:
Of the six local propositions the County Republicans, Democrats and the SDCTA all took positions on the “non-partisan” SDCTA lines up 100% with the GOP. (In fairness, the SDCTA breaks 50/50 with the two parties on the statewide propositions. This time around.) I haven’t taken the time to track, election by election, SDCTA ballot recommendations and compare them to the two parties. Maybe this summer. My hunch, though, is that, over the long haul, such research will find a strong correlation between the SDCTA and the GOP. I don’t think an organization that predominantly and consistently endorses the positions of one of the two parties has a lock on the claim to be “non-partisan.”
Indeed, the SDCTA’s claim to be non-partisan strikes me as something of a cop out. If the organization truly has faith in its convictions shouldn’t it acknowledge whom it aligns with and supports? Claiming to be non-partisan is an attempt by the SDCTA to give itself an imprimatur of superiority over all those other crassly partisan groups wrestling down in the political mud and muck while the SDCTA stands proudly on its noble non-partisan pedestal above the fray. It’s a brilliant marketing ploy, to be sure. But most group today that like to claim to be nonpartisan are like products that claim to be “new and improved” or “low fat.” The question is: Compared to what?
So I’ll spend tonight in watching the alternative realities that unfold on Lost. Meanwhile the SDCTA can continue living in its own alternative reality where it is truly non-partisan.