Which would be–if a Pew Research poll and piece working it’s way around the internet by a former Reagan Treasury official—not these United States. At least anymore.
The Pew Research poll, published this morning, concludes that “far more Americans now see their country as sharply divided along economic lines.” According to the poll results, in 1988 only 26% of Americans thought the country is divided between haves and have nots; today the country is evenly split 48%/48% on the issue. The number of Americans who see themselves as falling in the have-not category has also grown significantly, doubling from 17% to 34%.
Meanwhile, in a scathing analysis by Paul Craig Roberts, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration and a former assistant editor of the Editorial page of that bastion of Capitalism, The Wall Street Journal, the hollowing out of the American economy by over twenty years of Reaganomics and neo-liberal trade policies is blisteringly laid out.
Craig opens the piece, entitled “American Economy –R.I.P.” with the statement that “The US economy continues its slow death before our eyes, but economists, policymakers, and most of the public are blind to the tottering fabled land of opportunity.” He concludes “Hubris prevents realization that Americans are losing their economic future along with their civil liberties and are on the verge of enserfment.” What flows between is a detailed analysis of the real numbers in US trade and productivity that point toward a continued downward spiral for US middle and upper middle class households.
Click the links above for the documents in their entirety—they are a worthwhile read. They also underscore what is likely to prove to be the final nail in the Bush/GOP political coffin (as if Iraq wasn’t enough) –- the failure of the Republican supply-side agenda to provide true prosperity to the vast majority of the American public. In 1992 Bush the elder went down to defeat because, as Bill Clinton, they forgot “It’s the Economy Stupid. It looks like Bush II didn’t learn from Poppy’s mistake.
September 13, 2007 at 6:21 pm
Ah. LEGACY. That’s gonna bite.
September 14, 2007 at 7:22 am
Another data point: a Cener On Policy Initiatives brief on the unaffordability of housing in San Diego. Go to:
http://www.onlinecpi.org/article.php?list=type&type=275
September 14, 2007 at 6:02 pm
There are plenty of resources out there to find this information besides the “Center o Policy Initiatives.”
Least Affordable?:
10) Orlando
9) Boston
8) Seattle
7) Las Vegas
6) Sacramento
5) Miami
4) NYC
3) San Diego
2) SF
1) LA
40% in California and we make the top 3!.
The percentage of my monthly paycheck that goes toward my mortgage has been over 30% since….the day I bought it. You do what you have to do.
http://www.forbes.com/home/media/2007/07/20/unaffordable-housing-property-forbeslife-cx_mw_0723realestate.html
The Real Estate News has us even worse:
http://news.tom-hanna.com/?p=504
eFinanceDirectory reports on the Top Ten Least Affordable Cities based on median home prices:
San Jose, CA – $788,000
San Francisco, CA – $748,100
Any City in Orange County, CA – $697,300
Honolulu, HI – $620,000
San Diego, CA – $595,200
Los Angeles, CA – $589,000
New York City, NY – $521,400
Stamford, CT – $470,900
Long Island, NY – $463,700
Washington, DC – $427,800
We make 50% or five in the top ten on this list.
San Diego makes both lists.
So why are so many people still coming to California? Is it because even if you’re homeless, you don’t freeze to death?